Atom E680 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Platinum 8175M outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 7485% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 489 | 3428 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon Platinum | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.11 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
| Release date | no data | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 26 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 47 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | Intel BGA 676 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Atom E680.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.17 | 0.20 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 1 |
| Threads | 48 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8175M has a 7485% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E680 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8175M is a server/workstation processor while Atom E680 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
