Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX vs Xeon Phi 7210F
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Knights Landing (2016) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | July 2025 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 256 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | 33,260 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 3647 | sTR5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7210F and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 64 | 32 |
| Threads | 256 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 230 Watt | 350 Watt |
Xeon Phi 7210F has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 52.2% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon Phi 7210F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
