Xeon Phi 7210F vs Opteron X2 265 HE
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Designer | AMD | Intel |
Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
Architecture codename | Italy (2005−2006) | Knights Landing (2016) |
Release date | August 2005 (20 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 256 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Number of transistors | 233 million | 8,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | 940 | 3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 230 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 265 HE and Xeon Phi 7210F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 64 |
Threads | 2 | 256 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 230 Watt |
Opteron X2 265 HE has 318.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7210F, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron X2 265 HE and Intel Xeon Phi 7210F. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.