Atom N270 vs Xeon L5410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
50 Watt
1.22
+1256%
Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09

Xeon L5410 outperforms Atom N270 by a whopping 1256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5410 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23353395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.313.41
Architecture codenameno dataDiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$44

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.33 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data25.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35V0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5410 1.22
+1256%
Atom N270 0.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1940
+1326%
Atom N270 136

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.09
Recency 1 January 2008 2 April 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon L5410 has a 1255.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 2400% lower power consumption.

The Xeon L5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5410 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 67 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5410 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.