EPYC 9254 vs Xeon Gold 6346

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6346
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
24.35
EPYC 9254
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
44.60
+83.2%

EPYC 9254 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.9617.86
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Genoa
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299
Current price$2861 $2478 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9254 has 19% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6346.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3248
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.15 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data4x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6346 24.35
EPYC 9254 44.60
+83.2%

EPYC 9254 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6346 37665
EPYC 9254 68988
+83.2%

EPYC 9254 outperforms Xeon Gold 6346 by 83% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.35 44.60
Recency 6 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 32 48
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 9254 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6346 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6346 and EPYC 9254, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6346
Xeon Gold 6346
AMD EPYC 9254
EPYC 9254

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 11 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6346 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6346 or EPYC 9254, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.