Ryzen 5 7520U vs Xeon Gold 6338N

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6338N
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
26.50
+358%
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
5.79

Xeon Gold 6338N outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1871130
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency13.5536.51
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FP6
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6338N 26.50
+358%
Ryzen 5 7520U 5.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6338N 42086
+357%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9203

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.50 5.79
Recency 6 April 2021 20 September 2022
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Gold 6338N has a 357.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Ryzen 5 7520U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1133.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6338N is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6338N is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6338N and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6338N
Xeon Gold 6338N
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1498 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6338N or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.