Ryzen 5 7520U vs Xeon Silver 4316

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.26
+237%

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by a whopping 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2521034
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.99no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Mendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$1075 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads408
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data100 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FP6
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512LPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 20.26
+237%
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
+237%
Ryzen 5 7520U 9307

Xeon Silver 4316 outperforms Ryzen 5 7520U by 237% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.26 6.02
Recency 6 April 2021 20 September 2022
Physical cores 20 4
Threads 40 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 7520U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4316 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 7520U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1150 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.