Xeon Platinum 8352M vs Gold 6330

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Gold 6330
2021
28 cores / 56 threads
27.84
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
28.71
+3.1%

Platinum 8352M outperforms Gold 6330 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking152144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation22.752.08
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$2251 $9928

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6330 has 994% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8352M.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache42 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)86 °C81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXYes with Intel® SPSYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TB
Max memory channels88
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes6464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6330 27.84
Xeon Platinum 8352M 28.71
+3.1%

Platinum 8352M outperforms Gold 6330 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6330 43056
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406
+3.1%

Platinum 8352M outperforms Gold 6330 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 27.84 28.71
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 185 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6330 and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6330
Xeon Gold 6330
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6330 or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.