EPYC 7352 vs Xeon Gold 6240M
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 199 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 11.29 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Gold | AMD EPYC |
Power efficiency | no data | 15.51 |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,448 | $1,350 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 36 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 26 | 23 |
L1 cache | 1.125 MB | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 18 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 24.75 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | Socket P | TR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | 2 TB | 4 TiB |
Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 7 August 2019 |
Physical cores | 18 | 24 |
Threads | 36 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 155 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6240M has 3.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6240M and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.