AMD EPYC 7H12 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6146

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon Gold 6146
15.17

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 6146 by 199% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking40239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.255.01
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years old)18 September 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,286no data
Current price$989 (0.3x MSRP)$6796
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6146 has 105% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache768 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6146 15.17
EPYC 7H12 45.34
+199%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 6146 by 199% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6146 23296
EPYC 7H12 69633
+199%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 6146 by 199% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 15.17 45.34
Recency 11 July 2017 18 September 2019
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6146 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6146 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6146
Xeon Gold 6146
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Intel Xeon Gold 6146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6146 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.