EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Gold 6136

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6136
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
13.21
EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
33.11
+151%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Xeon Gold 6136 by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking563119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.719.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.3313.06
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,460$2,450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7F72 has 169% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6136.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3032
L1 cache768 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6136 13.21
EPYC 7F72 33.11
+151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6136 20977
EPYC 7F72 52597
+151%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Gold 6136 1067
EPYC 7F72 1318
+23.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Gold 6136 9089
EPYC 7F72 11819
+30%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.21 33.11
Recency 25 April 2017 14 April 2020
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon Gold 6136 has 60% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F72, on the other hand, has a 150.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6136 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6136 and EPYC 7F72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6136
Xeon Gold 6136
AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6136 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6136 or EPYC 7F72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.