EPYC 7F72 vs Xeon Platinum 8124M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8124M
18 cores / 36 threads, 240 Watt
17.21
EPYC 7F72
2020
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
33.11
+92.4%

EPYC 7F72 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8124M by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking372120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.44
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.7913.06
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateno data14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3648
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3032
L1 cache1.125 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP3
Power consumption (TDP)240 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 17.21
EPYC 7F72 33.11
+92.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 27336
EPYC 7F72 52597
+92.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 1231
EPYC 7F72 1318
+7.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Platinum 8124M 11252
EPYC 7F72 11819
+5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.21 33.11
Physical cores 18 24
Threads 36 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7F72 has a 92.4% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7F72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8124M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8124M and EPYC 7F72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M
Xeon Platinum 8124M
AMD EPYC 7F72
EPYC 7F72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8124M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8124M or EPYC 7F72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.