Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon Gold 5420+
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5420+ outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 250 by a whopping 170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 145 | 708 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 19.76 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 6.85 | 18.57 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,848 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 52.5 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 84 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 4677 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4400 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5420+ and Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 80 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.11 | 12.26 |
| Recency | 10 January 2023 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 8 |
| Threads | 56 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon Gold 5420+ has a 170.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 632.1% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5420+ is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 5420+ is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
