Celeron 4305UE vs Xeon Gold 5318Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5318Y
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
18.79
+1857%
Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96

Xeon Gold 5318Y outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 1857% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3692702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.06
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency12.216.86
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date6 April 2021 (4 years ago)1 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)87 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 18.79
+1857%
Celeron 4305UE 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5318Y 33139
+1851%
Samples: 5
Celeron 4305UE 1699
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.79 0.96
Recency 6 April 2021 1 October 2018
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon Gold 5318Y has a 1857.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has 1000% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5318Y is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 4305UE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Xeon Gold 5318Y
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5318Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 5318Y and Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.