Pentium Dual T4200 vs Xeon Gold 5120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
10.26
+1478%
Pentium Dual Core T4200
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.65

Xeon Gold 5120 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4200 by a whopping 1478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8552961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency4.160.79
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date11 July 2017 (8 years ago)1 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache896 KB128 KB
L2 cache14 MB1 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647P
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
AMTno data+

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Gold 5120 10.26
+1478%
Pentium Dual T4200 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Gold 5120 18132
+1478%
Samples: 25
Pentium Dual T4200 1149
Samples: 864

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.26 0.65
Recency 11 July 2017 1 January 2009
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon Gold 5120 has a 1478.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual T4200, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 5120 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T4200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
Pentium Dual Core T4200

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 137 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Gold 5120 and Pentium Dual Core T4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.