EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon Gold 5120

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 5120
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
11.43
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
45.02
+294%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 5120 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking61937
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.2122.09
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,555no data
Current price$392 (0.3x MSRP)$1970

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 36% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5120.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads28128
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache896 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 5120 11.43
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+294%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 5120 by 294% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 5120 17686
EPYC 7H12 69633
+294%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Gold 5120 by 294% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.43 45.02
Recency 11 July 2017 18 September 2019
Physical cores 14 64
Threads 28 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 5120 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 5120
Xeon Gold 5120
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 5120 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.