Core 2 Duo P8700 vs Xeon E7320
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E7320 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2843 | 3124 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 0.44 | 0.93 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (18 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $209 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7320 and Core 2 Duo P8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.0V-1.5V | 1V - 1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7320 and Core 2 Duo P8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA604,PPGA604 | BGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7320 and Core 2 Duo P8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| FSB parity | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E7320 and Core 2 Duo P8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7320 and Core 2 Duo P8700 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.84 | 0.55 |
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 1 January 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon E7320 has a 52.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Core 2 Duo P8700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E7320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E7320 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo P8700 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
