Xeon w9-3575X vs E7-4830

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E7-4830
2011
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
12.63
Xeon w9-3575X
2024
44 cores / 88 threads, 340 Watt
52.21
+313%

Xeon w9-3575X outperforms Xeon E7-4830 by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking60730
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2033.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E7no data
Power efficiency11.3414.47
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,059$3,789

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3575X has 962% better value for money than Xeon E7-4830.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)44
Threads1688
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB97.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size513 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors2600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketLGA1567FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt340 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth34.113 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-4830 12.63
Xeon w9-3575X 52.21
+313%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E7-4830 19981
Xeon w9-3575X 82624
+314%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.63 52.21
Recency 5 April 2011 24 August 2024
Physical cores 8 44
Threads 16 88
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 340 Watt

Xeon E7-4830 has 223.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3575X, on the other hand, has a 313.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3575X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-4830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-4830 and Xeon w9-3575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-4830
Xeon E7-4830
Intel Xeon w9-3575X
Xeon w9-3575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E7-4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w9-3575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-4830 or Xeon w9-3575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.