i3-13100F vs Xeon E7-4830
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E7-4830 outperforms Core i3-13100F by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 758 | 997 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.96 | 56.71 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E7 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.58 | 6.07 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EX (2011) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 5 April 2011 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,059 | $109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-13100F has 5807% better value for money than Xeon E7-4830.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 6.4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 513 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2600 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | LGA1567 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 58 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.113 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4830 and Core i3-13100F.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.37 | 8.33 |
| Recency | 5 April 2011 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 58 Watt |
Xeon E7-4830 has a 36.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i3-13100F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 81% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E7-4830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-13100F in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E7-4830 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-13100F is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
