Opteron 3380 vs Xeon E5606

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5606
2011, $46
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.40
Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.49
+77.9%

Opteron 3380 outperforms Xeon E5606 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24542004
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.43no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.741.62
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date14 February 2011 (15 years ago)4 December 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.13 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors1,170 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5606 1.40
Opteron 3380 2.49
+77.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5606 2443
Samples: 45
Opteron 3380 4358
+78.4%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 2.49
Recency 14 February 2011 4 December 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Opteron 3380 has a 78% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 23% lower power consumption.

The AMD Opteron 3380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5606 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Xeon E5606 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5606 and Opteron 3380, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.