Atom 330 vs Xeon E5606

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5606
2011, $46
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.40
+536%

Xeon E5606 outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 536% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24543494
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency0.741.16
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date14 February 2011 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$46$43

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon E5606 and Atom 330: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.13 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.13 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5606 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5606 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5606 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5606 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5606 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5606 and Atom 330.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5606 1.40
+536%
Atom 330 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5606 2443
+541%
Samples: 45
Atom 330 381
Samples: 194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.22
Recency 14 February 2011 2 April 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon E5606 has a 536% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E5606 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom 330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5606 is a server/workstation processor while Atom 330 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 20 votes

Rate Xeon E5606 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 70 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5606 and Atom 330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.