Core 2 Solo SU3300 vs Xeon E5540
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5540 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2297 | 3576 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Solo |
| Power efficiency | 2.13 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (16 years ago) | 20 August 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | $262 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 76 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 3 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5540 and Core 2 Solo SU3300.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.59 | 0.15 |
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 20 August 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 3 Watt |
Xeon E5540 has a 960% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Core 2 Solo SU3300, on the other hand, has 2566.7% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon E5540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5540 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
