Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Xeon E5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5335
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
0.89
+81.6%
Core 2 Duo P8600
2008, $209
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.49

Xeon E5335 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28183188
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency0.470.83
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 November 2006 (19 years ago)15 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$209

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache4 MB (per die)3 MB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size2x 143 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million274 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage range1V-1.5V1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketLGA771,PLGA771BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5335 0.89
+81.6%
Core 2 Duo P8600 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5335 1549
+79.9%
Samples: 14
Core 2 Duo P8600 861
Samples: 1793

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.49
Recency 14 November 2006 15 July 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E5335 has a 82% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Core 2 Duo P8600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E5335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5335 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo P8600 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 193 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5335 and Core 2 Duo P8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.