Opteron 4340 vs Xeon E5205
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3202 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.31 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (18 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 6 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 6144 KB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.212V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | LGA771 | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5205 and Opteron 4340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 4 December 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon E5205 has 46% lower power consumption.
Opteron 4340, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 41% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon E5205 and AMD Opteron 4340. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
