Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon X5260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5260
2007
80 Watt
0.80
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 120 Watt
22.17
+2671%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon X5260 by a whopping 2671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2513214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.47
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (Zen4)
Release date1 October 2007 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current price$1366 $520 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed3.33 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C89 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771AM5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5260 0.80
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 22.17
+2671%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon X5260 by 2671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5260 1238
Ryzen 7 7800X3D 34289
+2670%

Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon X5260 by 2670% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 22.17
Recency 1 October 2007 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 120 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5260 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5260 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5260 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5260
Xeon X5260
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 20 votes

Rate Xeon X5260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1323 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7800X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5260 or Ryzen 7 7800X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.