Atom N2600 vs Xeon E5-4640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-4640
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.41
+2105%
Atom N2600
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.20

Xeon E5-4640 outperforms Atom N2600 by a whopping 2105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13423233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.394.73
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 December 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,730$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size435 mm266 mm2
Number of transistors2,270 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt3.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB2.44 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-4640 4.41
+2105%
Atom N2600 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-4640 7012
+2119%
Atom N2600 316

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.41 0.20
Recency 14 May 2012 1 December 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 3 Watt

Xeon E5-4640 has a 2105% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom N2600, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-4640 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N2600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-4640 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N2600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-4640 and Atom N2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-4640
Xeon E5-4640
Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 183 votes

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-4640 or Atom N2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.