Xeon E3-1240L v3 vs E5-2699 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
12.87
+262%
Xeon E3-1240L v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.56

Xeon E5-2699 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1240L v3 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5981526
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.84
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency8.4013.48
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)11 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$278

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache45 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2160 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size768 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 12.87
+262%
Xeon E3-1240L v3 3.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20436
+261%
Xeon E3-1240L v3 5655

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.87 3.56
Recency 8 September 2014 11 May 2014
Physical cores 18 4
Threads 36 8
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a 261.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 350% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

Xeon E3-1240L v3, on the other hand, has 480% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2699 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240L v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E3-1240L v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
Xeon E3-1240L v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 900 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Xeon E3-1240L v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.