Ryzen 5 PRO 230 vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
11.36
+1.7%

Xeon E5-2699 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 230 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking780793
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency8.40no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Release date8 September 2014 (11 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)6 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size356 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt6 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 11.36
+1.7%
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 11.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20030
+1.7%
Samples: 573
Ryzen 5 PRO 230 19702
Samples: 76

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.36 11.17
Recency 8 September 2014 6 January 2025
Physical cores 18 6
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 230, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 2316.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 230 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230
Ryzen 5 PRO 230

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1025 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Ryzen 5 PRO 230, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.