Apple M2 Max vs Xeon E5-2699 v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
12.87
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.81
+30.6%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Xeon E5-2699 v3 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking598394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency8.3920.12
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)no data
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3612
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and M2 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 12.87
Apple M2 Max 16.81
+30.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20436
Apple M2 Max 26697
+30.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.87 16.81
Recency 8 September 2014 17 January 2023
Physical cores 18 12
Threads 36 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 79 Watt

Xeon E5-2699 v3 has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 30.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 340% more advanced lithography process, and 83.5% lower power consumption.

The M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2699 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2699 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 901 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 236 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.