Celeron M 550 vs Xeon E5-2697 v3

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking660not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency7.64no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache35 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors5,560 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2697 v3 18577
+3895%
Celeron M 550 465

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon E5-2697 v3 has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 550, on the other hand, has 383.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v3 and Celeron M 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Xeon E5-2697 v3
Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 673 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v3 or Celeron M 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.