Core i7-11700 vs Xeon E5-2697 v2

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2697 v2
2013
12 cores / 24 threads
9.24

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking760540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.8540.03
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 September 2013 (10 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723no data
Current price$73 (0x MSRP)$237

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-11700 has 83% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus support8GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s50 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697 v2 9.24
i7-11700 12.80
+38.5%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 14298
i7-11700 19800
+38.5%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 38% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 554
i7-11700 2105
+280%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 280% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 4290
i7-11700 8616
+101%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 101% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 4173
i7-11700 9493
+127%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 127% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 34776
i7-11700 51493
+48.1%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 48% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 8843
i7-11700 14738
+66.7%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 67% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 12.31
i7-11700 4.19
+194%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core i7-11700 by 194% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 18
i7-11700 20
+12.7%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 13% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 1550
i7-11700 1767
+14%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 14% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 105
i7-11700 233
+122%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 122% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 1.25
i7-11700 2.77
+122%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 122% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 8.7
i7-11700 12
+37.9%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 38% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 7269
+21.9%
i7-11700 5962

Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core i7-11700 by 22% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 165
i7-11700 267
+62.1%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 62% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon E5-2697 v2 85
i7-11700 93
+9.3%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 by 9% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.24 12.80
Recency 1 September 2013 16 March 2021
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-11700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2697 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-11700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Core i7-11700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Core i7-11700
Core i7-11700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 681 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2697 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 804 votes

Rate Core i7-11700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697 v2 or Core i7-11700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.