Ryzen 5 3350G vs Xeon E5-2696 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 v4
2016
22 cores / 44 threads, 150 Watt
16.24
+177%

Xeon E5-2696 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3350G by a whopping 177% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4281127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Picasso
Power efficiency9.87no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores22 (Docosa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L2 cache5.5 MBno data
L3 cache55 MB4096 KB
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size456.12 mm2no data
Number of transistors7200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 16.24
+177%
Ryzen 5 3350G 5.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2696 v4 24851
+176%
Ryzen 5 3350G 8989

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.24 5.87
Physical cores 22 4
Threads 44 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2696 v4 has a 176.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 450% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

Ryzen 5 3350G, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2696 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3350G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2696 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3350G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 v4 and Ryzen 5 3350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
Xeon E5-2696 v4
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G
Ryzen 5 3350G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 351 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2696 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 236 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 v4 or Ryzen 5 3350G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.