EPYC 9274F vs Xeon E5-2696 V3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2696 V3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads, 145 Watt
14.34
EPYC 9274F
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 320 Watt
47.50
+231%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by a whopping 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking47634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation53.6314.71
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Genoa
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,060
Current price$106 $2995 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 has 265% better value for money than EPYC 9274F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3648
Base clock speed2.3 GHz4.05 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.05 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)1536 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)24 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size356 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket2011-3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR42133 MHz Quad-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2696 V3 14.34
EPYC 9274F 47.50
+231%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2696 V3 22174
EPYC 9274F 73463
+231%

EPYC 9274F outperforms Xeon E5-2696 V3 by 231% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.34 47.50
Recency 8 September 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 18 24
Threads 36 48
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 320 Watt

The EPYC 9274F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2696 V3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2696 V3 and EPYC 9274F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2696 V3
Xeon E5-2696 V3
AMD EPYC 9274F
EPYC 9274F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1128 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2696 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9274F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2696 V3 or EPYC 9274F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.