Ryzen 7 1700X vs Xeon E5-2695 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 120 Watt
12.04
+22.1%
Ryzen 7 1700X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
9.86

Xeon E5-2695 v4 outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking645786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.523.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency9.459.77
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 March 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,424$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700X has 46% better value for money than Xeon E5-2695 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2134
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache4.5 MB4096 KB
L3 cache45 MB16384 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA3
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
XFR-+
SenseMI-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 12.04
+22.1%
Ryzen 7 1700X 9.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 19119
+22.1%
Ryzen 7 1700X 15660

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 954
Ryzen 7 1700X 1098
+15.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2695 v4 7316
+30.5%
Ryzen 7 1700X 5605

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.04 9.86
Recency 20 June 2016 2 March 2017
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E5-2695 v4 has a 22.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 125% more physical cores and 125% more threads.

Ryzen 7 1700X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 1700X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2695 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 1700X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 7 1700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Ryzen 7 1700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 97 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2695 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 742 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2695 v4 or Ryzen 7 1700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.