Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Xeon E5-2690 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 135 Watt
12.26
+5738%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21

Xeon E5-2690 v4 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 5738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6223215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.03no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency8.590.32
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Newark (2003)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)August 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,090no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads281
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/s800 MHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cache3.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache35 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size306.18 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011754
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR1
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 12.26
+5738%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 v4 19477
+5875%
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.26 0.21
Physical cores 14 1
Threads 28 1
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 62 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v4 has a 5738.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, on the other hand, has 117.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v4 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Xeon E5-2690 v4
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1672 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v4 or Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.