i7-3970X vs Xeon E5-2690 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2690 v2
2013
10 cores / 20 threads, 130 Watt
8.49
+58.4%
Core i7-3970X
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 150 Watt
5.36

Xeon E5-2690 v2 outperforms Core i7-3970X by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8991177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.120.62
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency6.183.38
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 November 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,697$593

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2690 v2 has 81% better value for money than i7-3970X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads2012
Base clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature88 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB64.45 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2690 v2 8.49
+58.4%
i7-3970X 5.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2690 v2 13484
+58.3%
i7-3970X 8516

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2690 v2 589
i7-3970X 729
+23.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2690 v2 4128
+11.9%
i7-3970X 3688

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.49 5.36
Recency 1 September 2013 1 November 2012
Physical cores 10 6
Threads 20 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E5-2690 v2 has a 58.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2690 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3970X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2690 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-3970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2690 v2 and Core i7-3970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Core i7-3970X
Core i7-3970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 557 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2690 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Core i7-3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2690 v2 or Core i7-3970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.