Xeon X7350 vs E5-2689

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
6.17
+26.7%
Xeon X7350
2007
6 cores / 6 threads, 130 Watt
4.87

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Xeon X7350 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12111371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.43
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeonno data
Power efficiency5.183.61
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Tigerton (2007)
Release date6 March 2012 (13 years ago)6 September 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,301

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz0.93 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
Socket2011PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-2689 6.17
+26.7%
Xeon X7350 4.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 9922
+26.6%
Xeon X7350 7836

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.17 4.87
Recency 6 March 2012 6 September 2007
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 has a 26.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 13% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X7350 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689
Xeon E5-2689
Intel Xeon X7350
Xeon X7350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3266 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon X7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-2689 and Xeon X7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.