Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon E5-2697A v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2697A v4
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 145 Watt
13.78
+130%

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking4931030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.5416.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (7 years ago)7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,891no data
Current price$705 (0.2x MSRP)$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3400G has 116% better value for money than Xeon E5-2697A v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache40 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm12 nm
Die size456.12 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistors7200 Million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2697A v4 13.78
+130%
Ryzen 5 3400G 5.99

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by 130% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2697A v4 21321
+130%
Ryzen 5 3400G 9272

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by 130% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697A v4 1059
Ryzen 5 3400G 1127
+6.4%

Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2697A v4 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon E5-2697A v4 8295
+130%
Ryzen 5 3400G 3612

Xeon E5-2697A v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G by 130% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.78 5.99
Recency 20 June 2016 7 July 2019
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 32 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5-2697A v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 3400G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2697A v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2697A v4 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
Xeon E5-2697A v4
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2697A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1989 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2697A v4 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.