EPYC Embedded 3151 vs Xeon E5-2689
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1082 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Xeon | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 5.15 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 6 March 2012 (12 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 27 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 435 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,270 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 2011 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 March 2012 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon E5-2689 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
EPYC Embedded 3151, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 155.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and EPYC Embedded 3151, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
