Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Xeon E5-2689

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
6.25
+417%
Core 2 Quad Q9100
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.21

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9100 by a whopping 417% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10822345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonCore 2 Quad
Power efficiency5.142.54
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.26 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB (per die)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size435 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket2011PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 6.25
+417%
Core 2 Quad Q9100 1.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 9922
+418%
Core 2 Quad Q9100 1915

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 1.21
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 has a 416.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q9100, on the other hand, has 155.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Core 2 Quad Q9100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689
Xeon E5-2689
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3056 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 or Core 2 Quad Q9100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.