Celeron J1900 vs Xeon E5-2689

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2689
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
6.25
+768%
Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72

Xeon E5-2689 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 768% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10832697
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesXeonIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.146.81
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.42 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2689 6.25
+768%
Celeron J1900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2689 9922
+764%
Celeron J1900 1149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.25 0.72
Recency 6 March 2012 1 November 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E5-2689 has a 768.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1050% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2689 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2689 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2689 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2689
Xeon E5-2689
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3056 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2689 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2689 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.