Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Xeon E5-2682 v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2682 v4 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8800 by a whopping 1932% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 648 | 2814 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 9.46 | 2.23 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $241 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | 1066 MHz |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 40 MB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 456.12 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 7200 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1V-1.25V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | BGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.99 | 0.59 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 1 April 2009 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
Xeon E5-2682 v4 has a 1932.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Duo P8800, on the other hand, has 380% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E5-2682 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8800 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2682 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo P8800 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2682 v4 and Core 2 Duo P8800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
