Core i7-4960X vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 630 | 980 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 28.58 | 1.28 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon (Desktop) | Intel Core i7 (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-EP (2016) | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (7 years ago) | 3 September 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,745 | $999 |
| Current price | $126 (0.1x MSRP) | $450 (0.5x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon E5-2680 v4 has 2133% better value for money than i7-4960X.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus support | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 448 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3.5 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 35 MB | 15 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 86 °C | 67 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | 1,860 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Smart Response | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 1.5 TB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 76% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 49% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 105% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i7-4960X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by 6% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 57% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Core i7-4960X by 54% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core i7-4960X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v4 by 44% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.51 | 6.52 |
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 3 September 2013 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 6 |
| Threads | 28 | 12 |
| Cost | $1745 | $999 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 130 Watt |
The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-4960X in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-4960X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Core i7-4960X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
