Atom E3845 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 120 Watt
11.50
+1591%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Atom E3845 by a whopping 1591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking6322623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.70no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon (Desktop)Atom
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date10 March 2016 (8 years ago)8 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,745no data
Current price$141 (0.1x MSRP)$781

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads284
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.91 GHz
Bus support9.6 GT/s / QPIno data
L1 cache448 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size306 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v4 11.50
+1591%
Atom E3845 0.68

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Atom E3845 by 1591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2680 v4 17791
+1582%
Atom E3845 1058

Xeon E5-2680 v4 outperforms Atom E3845 by 1582% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.50 0.68
Recency 10 March 2016 8 October 2013
Physical cores 14 4
Threads 28 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 10 Watt

The Xeon E5-2680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom E3845 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v4 and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
Xeon E5-2680 v4
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 3299 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 10 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v4 or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.