Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs Xeon E5-2680 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2680 v2
2013
10 cores / 20 threads, 115 Watt
7.97
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.72
+122%

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking931345
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency6.5647.91
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,260no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.8 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache25 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2680 v2 7.97
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.72
+122%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2680 v2 12663
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28144
+122%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2680 v2 566
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2295
+305%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2680 v2 3851
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 10816
+181%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.97 17.72
Recency 1 September 2013 13 June 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2680 v2 has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has a 122.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 228.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2680 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2680 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2680 v2 and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
Xeon E5-2680 v2
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 525 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2680 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2680 v2 or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.