EPYC 7551 vs Xeon E5-2673 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2673 v4
2016
20 cores / 40 threads, 135 Watt
12.99
EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
16.34
+25.8%

EPYC 7551 outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v4 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking576400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.23
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.118.59
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads4064
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier2320
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache50 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size456.12 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors7200 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 12.99
EPYC 7551 16.34
+25.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 20631
EPYC 7551 25960
+25.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 1002
+11.7%
EPYC 7551 897

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2673 v4 7888
+36.8%
EPYC 7551 5764

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.99 16.34
Recency 20 June 2016 29 June 2017
Physical cores 20 32
Threads 40 64
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon E5-2673 v4 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7551, on the other hand, has a 25.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.

The EPYC 7551 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2673 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2673 v4 and EPYC 7551, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
Xeon E5-2673 v4
AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 121 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2673 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2673 v4 or EPYC 7551, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.