Celeron E1600 vs Xeon E5-2670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2670
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
5.78
+970%

Xeon E5-2670 outperforms Celeron E1600 by a whopping 970% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking10652738
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.77no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$145no data
Current price$58 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (shared)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C73 °C
Number of transistors2,270 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2670 5.78
+970%
Celeron E1600 0.54

Xeon E5-2670 outperforms Celeron E1600 by 970% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2670 8947
+965%
Celeron E1600 840

Xeon E5-2670 outperforms Celeron E1600 by 965% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.78 0.54
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon E5-2670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2670 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron E1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2670 and Celeron E1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2670
Xeon E5-2670
Intel Celeron E1600
Celeron E1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 392 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Celeron E1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2670 or Celeron E1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.