i9-13900KS vs Xeon E5-2665

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2665
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
5.23
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
38.74
+641%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2665 by a whopping 641% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking118474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.5653.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.3024.44
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KS has 601% better value for money than Xeon E5-2665.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size435 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size384 GB192 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2665 5.23
i9-13900KS 38.74
+641%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2665 8315
i9-13900KS 61538
+640%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2665 493
i9-13900KS 3137
+536%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2665 2971
i9-13900KS 21730
+631%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 38.74
Recency 6 March 2012 12 January 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E5-2665 has 30.4% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KS, on the other hand, has a 640.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2665 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2665 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2665 and Core i9-13900KS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2665
Xeon E5-2665
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 75 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2665 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 831 vote

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2665 or Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.