Celeron G3900E vs Xeon E5-2660 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1034	2278
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.06	0.12
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	6.58	3.46
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date	1 September 2013 (11 years ago)	2 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$850	$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2660 v2 has 1617% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	10 (Deca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	20	2
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 3.0
Bus rate	8 GT/s	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	24
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	25 MB (shared)	2 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Die size	160 mm2	98.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature	75 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	1750 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA2011	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size	768 GB	64 GB
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	59.7 GB/s	34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	40	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	6.61	1.28
Recency	1 September 2013	2 January 2016
Physical cores	10	2
Threads	20	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2660 v2 and Celeron G3900E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---