Ryzen Threadripper 1900 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 897 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.59 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 7.66 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell-EP (2016) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 16 March 2016 (8 years ago) | 31 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,166 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 22 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 80 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,400 million | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2011 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1.5 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 March 2016 | 31 August 2017 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 8 |
| Threads | 24 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 125 Watt |
Xeon E5-2650 v4 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 19% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1900 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Ryzen Threadripper 1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
